
COST vs WMT
$COST vs $WMT head to head: price, market cap, valuation, dividend, free float, relative volume and how actively each trades. The bigger value in the size rows is bolded. Tap either ticker for its live chart, full ownership breakdown and real-time alerts.
COST vs WMT: the quick read
- ·WMT is the larger company by market cap ($825.25B vs $420.30B).
- ·WMT has been more active on our scanner (98 vs 11 alerts in 30 days).
- ·COST has the smaller float (443.0M vs 4.43B), which tends to mean sharper, more volatile moves.
- ·WMT trades at the lower P/E (17.2 vs 64.6).
- ·Both are retail-variety stores names, so this is a like-for-like comparison and sector news tends to move them together.
- ·WMT trades at a small fraction of the other's share price, so position sizing and the size of a "normal" move differ a lot between them.
- ·WMT draws far more of our scanner's attention, 98 unusual-volume alerts in 30 days against 11, so it is the more actively traded of the two by some distance.
- ·Both pay a dividend, so this is one of the few pairs here where yield is a fair tiebreaker.
Objective differences only. Not investment advice.
Get the best catches in your inbox
Free daily email of the top plays and unusual-volume alerts our scanner flags. No account needed.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know comparing COST and WMT on TheDesperateTrader.
- Is COST or WMT the better stock?
- "Better" depends on your goal, and these two are not alike. WMT is the larger company by market cap ($825.25B vs $420.30B). WMT has been more active on our scanner (98 vs 11 alerts in 30 days). COST has the smaller float (443.0M vs 4.43B), which tends to mean sharper, more volatile moves. Those are the measured differences, not a recommendation, and nothing here is investment advice.
- What is the difference between COST and WMT?
- The differences that matter: they are similar in size ($420.30B vs $825.25B); they trade at very different share prices ($947.74 vs $103.65); COST sits at 41% of its 52-week range against 21% for WMT; our scanner flagged COST 11 times in the last 30 days against 98 for WMT. Everything above is measured from the latest completed session and SEC filings.
- Which of COST and WMT is more active right now?
- Right now COST is at about 1.2x its normal volume and WMT is at about 1.9x, so WMT is the one drawing unusual attention today. Relative volume (RVOL) compares a stock's volume to its own recent average, so it reads the same way for a megacap and a microcap and is the quickest way to tell which of two similar names is actually in play.
- Is this comparison data live?
- Prices and % changes are anchored to the latest completed session and split-adjusted, so a reverse split never shows as a fake move. Float is estimated from SEC filings and refreshed as new filings publish.
Trading COST or WMT? Get real-time unusual-volume alerts the moment either one moves, free.
No card · 5 premium daysExplore the market
Free, live market tools. No account required to look.